Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700
96 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
90 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Launched February 2014
- Replaced the Nikon S9500
- Newer Model is Nikon S9900
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Fujifilm Z33WP and Nikon S9700, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and S9700 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Z33WP was released 5 years prior to the S9700 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm Z33WP matches up versus the S9700 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Nikon Coolpix S9700. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Nikon S9700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Nikon S9700
| Fujifilm Z33WP | S9700 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| S9700 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2014 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 56 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Nikon S9700
| Fujifilm Z33WP | S9700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z33WP features outer measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9700 has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Z33WP and Nikon S9700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the S9700.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and S9700 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z33WP and S9700.
As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Nikon S9700 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2014-02-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lbs) | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $197 | $350 |