Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50
96 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus SH-50, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and SH-50 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Z33WP was revealed 4 years prior to the SH-50 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm Z33WP scores against the SH-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Olympus SH-50. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery and Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus SH-50
| Fujifilm Z33WP | SH-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| SH-50 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus SH-50
| Fujifilm Z33WP | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP has outside measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Olympus SH-50 has specifications of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus SH-50 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP against the SH-50.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and SH-50 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z33WP and SH-50.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus SH-50 to offer extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus SH-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus SH-50 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lb) | 269 grams (0.59 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $197 | $300 |