Clicky

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
20
Overall
27
Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP front
 
Olympus SP-565UZ front
Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

Fujifilm Z33WP
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Launched January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview

Below is a extensive comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm Z33WP was released 6 months later than the SP-565UZ so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades against the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm Z33WP SP-565UZ 
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Fujifilm Z33WP

 SP-565UZ Fujifilm Z33WP 
Manual focus More precise focusing

Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus SP-565UZ

 Fujifilm Z33WP SP-565UZ 
LaunchedJuly 2009January 2009Same age
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP enjoys external dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP against the SP-565UZ.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and SP-565UZ is 96 and 72 respectively.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and SP-565UZ.

Plainly, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you need to consider the age of the cameras into account.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm Z33WP
Portrait photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
19
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
39
you can focus manually
saves RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Street photography advice
Olympus SP-565UZ Street photography advice
60
environment sealing
lighter than competitors (110 grams)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Sports photography factors
Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography factors
23
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
33
long zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
60
lighter than competitors (110g)
environment sealing
flash built-in
no Time Lapse recording
low MP (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
52
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
great zoom (520mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm Z33WP
Landscape photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
26
environment sealing
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
40
you can focus manually
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5")
low resolution (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Vlogging features
Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging features
25
lighter than competitors (110g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic support
24
fairly wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus SP-565UZ
 Fujifilm FinePix Z33WPOlympus SP-565UZ
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP Olympus SP-565UZ
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2009-07-01 2009-01-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 64 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 143
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 26-520mm (20.0x)
Max aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.8-4.5
Macro focus distance 8cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 2.5"
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 1s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 1.0 frames per second 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.90 m 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 110 gr (0.24 pounds) 413 gr (0.91 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 30
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.1
DXO Low light score not tested 68
Other
Battery model NP-45 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal xD Picture Card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $197 $400