Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus TG-860, both Waterproof cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z33WP was revealed 6 years before the TG-860 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm Z33WP being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades against the TG-860 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus TG-860
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| TG-860 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 68 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus TG-860
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z33WP has got outer measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the TG-860.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-860 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-860.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-860 to produce greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 lb) | 224 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $197 | $279 |