Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Olympus TG-320, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z33WP was launched 3 years prior to the TG-320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades versus the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| TG-320 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus TG-320
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP has external measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP vs the TG-320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The image below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-320.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-320 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z33WP will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $197 | $0 |