Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
Portability
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
Fujifilm Z33WP
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2009
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, both Waterproof cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z33WP was introduced 3 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades versus the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| TG-820 iHS | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z33WP features external measurements of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP and the TG-820 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-820 iHS is 96 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-820 iHS to provide more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP will be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm Z33WP as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus not available
no manual control
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
comes with face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Fujifilm Z33WP Street photography information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography information
environment sealing
lighter than competitors in class (110 grams)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Fujifilm Z33WP as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Sports photography camera
environment sealing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
slow frames per second (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (220 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm Z33WP as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
lighter than competitors in class (110g)
environment sealing
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low megapixels (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
environment proof
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (220 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm Z33WP Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography features
environment sealing
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
fairly wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery pack (220 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm Z33WP Vlogging details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging details
lighter than competitors in class (110 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.7)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $197 | $500 |