Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z33WP was launched 3 years before the TG-1 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm Z33WP scores against the TG-1 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-1 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| TG-1 iHS | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2012 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 34 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| Fujifilm Z33WP | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z33WP offers exterior dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has sizing of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP vs the TG-1 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-1 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z33WP and TG-1 iHS.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-1 iHS to give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2012-05-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 610k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 gr (0.24 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45 | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $197 | $399 |
