Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900, both Waterproof cameras by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and G900 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Z33WP was brought out 9 years before the G900 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm Z33WP matches up versus the G900 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Ricoh G900
| Fujifilm Z33WP | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| G900 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 105 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Ricoh G900
| Fujifilm Z33WP | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP has got exterior dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the G900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and G900 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z33WP and G900.
As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh G900 to result in extra detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP will be behind in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Ricoh G900 |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110g (0.24 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $197 | $752 |