Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Successor is Ricoh WG-80
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Z33WP was unveiled 11 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades versus the WG-70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Ricoh WG-70. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Ricoh WG-70
| Fujifilm Z33WP | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| WG-70 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 129 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Ricoh WG-70
| Fujifilm Z33WP | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP has got external dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP and the WG-70.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and WG-70.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer you more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110g (0.24 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $197 | $280 |