Clicky

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
20
Overall
27
Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP front
 
Ricoh WG-M1 front
Portability
91
Imaging
38
Features
22
Overall
31

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z33WP
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched July 2009
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 1.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
  • 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
  • Launched September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview

Its time to examine more in depth at the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and WG-M1 (14MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm Z33WP was brought out 6 years prior to the WG-M1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Ricoh WG-M1

 Fujifilm Z33WP WG-M1 
Screen sizing2.7"1.5"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution230k115kSharper screen (+115k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm Z33WP

 WG-M1 Fujifilm Z33WP 
LaunchedSeptember 2014July 2009More recent by 63 months

Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Ricoh WG-M1

 Fujifilm Z33WP WG-M1 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Neither has Touch screen

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z33WP has outer dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Examine the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the WG-M1.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and WG-M1 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The visual here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z33WP and WG-M1.

As you have seen, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to provide extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Portrait photography information
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
29
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Street photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography details
60
weather proofing
lighter than competitors in class (110g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
52
weather sealing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
low maximum ISO (800)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography advice
23
weather proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
37
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
better than average battery power (350 per charge)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography details
60
lighter than competitors in class (110g)
weather proofing
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
64
better than average battery power (350 shots)
weather sealing
decent megapixels (14MP)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography information
26
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
35
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
better than average battery power (350 shots)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length ((1×)mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (1.5 inches)
no manual control
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (800)
lack of RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z33WP Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Vlogging highlights
25
lighter than competitors in class (110 grams)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone support
26
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm Z33WP vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z33WP and Ricoh WG-M1
 Fujifilm FinePix Z33WPRicoh WG-M1
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP Ricoh WG-M1
Class Waterproof Waterproof
Launched 2009-07-01 2014-09-12
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 800
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) (1×)
Max aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/2.8
Macro focus range 8cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 1.5 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 115 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds -
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.90 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 110g (0.24 lb) 190g (0.42 lb)
Dimensions 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-45 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal microSD/microSDHC, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $197 $2,000