Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
32 Features
20 Overall
27
96 Imaging
32 Features
21 Overall
27
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Samsung SL102, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty comparable and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm Z33WP was introduced 6 months later than the SL102 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades against the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm Z33WP | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| SL102 | Fujifilm Z33WP |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung SL102
| Fujifilm Z33WP | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2009 |  | January 2009 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z33WP comes with external dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP versus the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing specifications. The graphic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and SL102.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos but you should always factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110g (0.24 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $197 | $130 |