Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung SL202, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Z33WP was manufactured 5 months later than the SL202 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z33WP matches up versus the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP and Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm Z33WP | SL202 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| SL202 | Fujifilm Z33WP |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm Z33WP | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 | February 2009 | Similar generation | |
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z33WP comes with exterior dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Z33WP and Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP versus the SL202.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z33WP and SL202 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and SL202.
Clearly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs however you should really consider the release date of the products into consideration.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Samsung SL202 |
| Alternative name | - | PL50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $197 | $140 |