Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus SH-3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Z35 was manufactured 7 years before the SH-3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades vs the SH-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus SH-3
| Fujifilm Z35 | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Fujifilm Z35
| SH-3 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | July 2009 | More modern by 79 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus SH-3
| Fujifilm Z35 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 comes with outer measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 against the SH-3.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and SH-3 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and SH-3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus SH-3 to offer you greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2016-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.5 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 271 gr (0.60 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | $579 |