Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 8010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus 8010, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and 8010 (13MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Z35 was manufactured 6 months earlier than the 8010 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up against the 8010 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus 8010
| Fujifilm Z35 | 8010 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Fujifilm Z35
| 8010 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus 8010
| Fujifilm Z35 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 |  | February 2010 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 has outside dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has proportions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus 8010 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the 8010.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and 8010 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by researching specs. The graphic below will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and 8010.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Olympus 8010 to provide you with more detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 13MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 3s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $130 | $600 |
