Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
93 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Let's look closer at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and TG-610 (14MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z35 was announced 17 months prior to the TG-610 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up versus the TG-610 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus TG-610
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-610 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Fujifilm Z35
| TG-610 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 17 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-610
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-610 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 offers outer measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 compared to the TG-610.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-610 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reading specs. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-610.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-610 to offer you more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-610 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-610 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 210 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $130 | $223 |