Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Let's look closer at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z35 was released 4 years earlier than the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores vs the TG-630 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Fujifilm Z35
| TG-630 iHS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z35 has got exterior dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the TG-630 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-630 iHS is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-630 iHS to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $200 |