Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-810, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and TG-810 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Z35 was released 3 years earlier than the TG-810 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores against the TG-810 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Olympus TG-810. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus TG-810
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-810 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Fujifilm Z35
| TG-810 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 25 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-810
| Fujifilm Z35 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z35 offers physical measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has sizing of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus TG-810 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the TG-810.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-810 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by researching specs. The pic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and TG-810.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-810 to render greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 3 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $130 | $428 |