Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Announced July 2009
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

The following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus VR-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Fujifilm Z35 was unveiled 24 months prior to the VR-320 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades against the VR-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm Z35 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm Z35

 VR-320 Fujifilm Z35 
AnnouncedJuly 2011July 2009Newer by 24 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm Z35 VR-320 
Manually focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z35 comes with physical dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Analyze the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 against the VR-320.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and VR-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and VR-320.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to provide you with more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Portrait photography features
Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography features
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
features face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm Z35
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
54
lighter than competition (125 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography info
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
features tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (300mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Landscape photography details
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography details
22
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
42
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
25
lighter than competition (125 grams)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.7)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone port
32
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Olympus VR-320
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Olympus VR-320
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-07-22 2011-07-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 8cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 3 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.10 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-45A LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $130 $179