Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4036a/4036a5c141de5ade52ff4704395d37b58b6f4514" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm Z35 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z35 was announced 4 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores against the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm Z35 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm Z35
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 41 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm Z35 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 has outer measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b4e/11b4ec37576251188e75a8d185b4e6d88119c05a" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39068/39068d3e6140b20168d8eceed2d4ca40d11dcffa" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The visual below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3258c/3258ce15037c1bfb8193bf5c649e7e93c8166ca5" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9beca/9becacd70f013801039945e18cf5814ff152cd16" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-22 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 3s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $130 | $450 |