Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
93 Imaging
31 Features
35 Overall
32
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Fujifilm Z35 versus Ricoh CX2, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Z35 was released within a month of the CX2 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up against the CX2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Ricoh CX2. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh CX2
| Fujifilm Z35 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Fujifilm Z35
| CX2 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh CX2
| Fujifilm Z35 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2009 | August 2009 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 features physical dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z35 versus Ricoh CX2 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the CX2.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and CX2 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and CX2.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Fujifilm Z35 to give you extra detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $341 |