Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4036a/4036a5c141de5ade52ff4704395d37b58b6f4514" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74efc/74efc246825aff5ab2faab7c06cfeb0ab333069a" alt="Ricoh G900 front Ricoh G900 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh G900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and G900 (20MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z35 was manufactured 9 years prior to the G900 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades vs the G900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Ricoh G900. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh G900
Fujifilm Z35 | G900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Fujifilm Z35
G900 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 104 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh G900
Fujifilm Z35 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 comes with outside measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh G900 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 compared to the G900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6209/d620980c7f847294dc2bc7a4536f9fc13d859bcb" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and G900 is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d01e5/d01e541c91f98d0bc6d40c7cad554c7aad7642c0" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and G900.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh G900 to result in more detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c933f/c933f75abc5dfd45c981d5833f58dde017145066" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfe9f/dfe9f5bace8a9070a708d509e444379e5038e7c8" alt="Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh G900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 3s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $130 | $752 |