Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Announced July 2009
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Launched August 2011
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and PX (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

The Fujifilm Z35 was revealed 3 years prior to the PX and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up against the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh PX

 Fujifilm Z35 PX 

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Fujifilm Z35

 PX Fujifilm Z35 
LaunchedAugust 2011July 2009Fresher by 25 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display dimensions2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh PX

 Fujifilm Z35 PX 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z35 provides outside dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the PX.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and PX.

Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh PX to render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
43
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm Z35
Street photography with Ricoh PX
54
lighter than competition (125 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm Z35
Sports photography with Ricoh PX
16
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm Z35
Travel photography with Ricoh PX
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
68
environment sealing
MP count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Landscape photography details
Ricoh PX Landscape photography details
22
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse function
47
has manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
environment sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Vlogging details
Ricoh PX Vlogging details
25
lighter than competition (125g)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focusing
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh PX
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Ricoh
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Ricoh PX
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-22 2011-08-16
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3072
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus distance 8cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 3s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 156 grams (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-45A DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $130 $329