Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Announced July 2009
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Revealed October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm Z35 was manufactured 6 years before the WG-30 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades vs the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh WG-30

 Fujifilm Z35 WG-30 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Fujifilm Z35

 WG-30 Fujifilm Z35 
RevealedOctober 2014July 2009Fresher by 63 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-30

 Fujifilm Z35 WG-30 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 enjoys external dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 vs the WG-30.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-30.

Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography info
19
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
35
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm Z35
Street photography with Ricoh WG-30
54
lighter than others (125 grams)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
61
built in image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm Z35
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-30
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
45
built in image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm Z35
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-30
56
lighter than others (125 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
71
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Timelapse function
43
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm Z35
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-30
25
lighter than others (125g)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.7)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone socket
33
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-30
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Ricoh WG-30
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Announced 2009-07-22 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 8cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 3 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lbs) 192 gr (0.42 lbs)
Physical dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $130 $428