Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Z35 was manufactured 6 years before the WG-30 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades vs the WG-30 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh WG-30
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Fujifilm Z35
| WG-30 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 | July 2009 | Fresher by 63 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-30
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z35 enjoys external dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 vs the WG-30.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-30.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-07-22 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 3 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 192 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $130 | $428 |