Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm Z35 was released 11 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up vs the WG-70 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh WG-70
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Fujifilm Z35
| WG-70 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 128 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh WG-70
| Fujifilm Z35 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 offers physical measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-70 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the WG-70.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and WG-70.
Clearly, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 3 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $130 | $280 |
