Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
In this article, we are evaluating the Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Z35 was introduced 24 months before the WB210 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up versus the WB210 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 and Samsung WB210. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Samsung WB210
| Fujifilm Z35 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Crisper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Fujifilm Z35
| WB210 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Samsung WB210
| Fujifilm Z35 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z35 has got external measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 vs the WB210.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and WB210 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and WB210.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB210 to produce greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Samsung WB210 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-22 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 3 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 174g (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $130 | $279 |