Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm Z35 was launched 4 years prior to the WB800F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Z35 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm Z35
| WB800F | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 42 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Z35 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z35 offers external measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 and the WB800F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z35 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB800F to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 8cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 3 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $130 | $300 |