Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
91 Imaging
45 Features
67 Overall
53
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3-inch Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 242g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Released September 2018
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Fujifilm Z35 versus Sony HX99, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies FujiFilm and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and HX99 (18MP) and the Fujifilm Z35 (1/2.3") and HX99 (1/2.3-inch) offer totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Z35 was introduced 10 years before the HX99 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm Z35 scores versus the HX99 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z35 Gallery & Sony HX99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Sony HX99
| Fujifilm Z35 | HX99 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX99 over the Fujifilm Z35
| HX99 | Fujifilm Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2018 | July 2009 | More recent by 110 months | |
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3.00" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Sony HX99
| Fujifilm Z35 | HX99 |
|---|
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z35 provides physical measurements of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony HX99 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 242 grams (0.53 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z35 versus Sony HX99 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 versus the HX99.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and HX99 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by checking specs. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z35 and HX99.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Z35 having a larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Sony HX99 will give greater detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Z35 vs Sony HX99 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX99 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-07-22 | 2018-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3-inch |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 3 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 242 grams (0.53 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | $469 |