Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2c0/da2c07f0dfe5c264fe8f9886b1e21b4e9c9834b5" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11aa8/11aa8bf7c0d8f0f0f49347a4f0cd931f2cc4ed13" alt="Kodak EasyShare M340 front Kodak EasyShare M340 front"
96 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched April 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
- 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and M340 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and M340 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z900EXR was introduced 2 years after the M340 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR scores vs the M340 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Kodak EasyShare M340. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery and Kodak M340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Kodak M340
Fujifilm Z900EXR | M340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 28 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
M340 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Kodak M340
Fujifilm Z900EXR | M340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR has outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Kodak M340 has measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and the M340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dd23/2dd2331ba59ba1e56b86ec64d7bb141970720fa8" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and M340 is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2c1d/e2c1d69ca3b6da6e10be0a767d9ec557c5ed6144" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The pic below will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and M340.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will produce more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm Z900EXR provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/241f2/241f26c621dba2007a3d2595a0ff817c3f0e65d9" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/298cc/298ccb7a1ff68b3812998e780ccd2e070c44106c" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M340 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Kodak EasyShare M340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Kodak EasyShare M340 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-04-05 | 2009-01-05 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2748 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 5 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.1-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) | 115 gr (0.25 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7001 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $380 | $130 |