Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2c0/da2c07f0dfe5c264fe8f9886b1e21b4e9c9834b5" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c4ce/8c4ce20def78097bda6beda7db3d6b1897c27c9f" alt="Kodak EasyShare M380 front Kodak EasyShare M380 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed April 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380, both Ultracompact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and M380 (10MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and M380 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z900EXR was unveiled 2 years later than the M380 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR matches up versus the M380 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR & Kodak EasyShare M380. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery & Kodak M380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Kodak M380
Fujifilm Z900EXR | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 28 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
M380 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Kodak M380
Fujifilm Z900EXR | M380 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z900EXR provides outer measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Kodak M380 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and the M380.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/910b2/910b2d96bc08874cab4c1341da7a71e15cd65590" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and M380 is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c756/0c756556c6b6129594ceca5ff4d637fd7d72287c" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The photograph underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and M380.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Z900EXR with its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will provide greater detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm Z900EXR is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6642/d66426b21264ed4e869a4a9ea210e6aab455fd0e" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba809/ba809e126eb4d2be806ef5e8aa9977ac6476ab9b" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M380 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Kodak EasyShare M380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Kodak |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Kodak EasyShare M380 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2011-04-05 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-190mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1448 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-45A | KLIC-7003 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $380 | $160 |