Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
95 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Announced April 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact cameras by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the M575 (14MP) is very comparable but the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and M575 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z900EXR was introduced 16 months later than the M575 making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR grades versus the M575 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Kodak EasyShare M575. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery and Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Kodak M575
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2011 | January 2010 | More recent by 16 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| M575 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Kodak M575
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR enjoys physical dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to the M575.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and M575.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm Z900EXR having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will produce extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm Z900EXR is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-04-05 | 2010-01-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $380 | $139 |