Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2c0/da2c07f0dfe5c264fe8f9886b1e21b4e9c9834b5" alt="Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46c4d/46c4ded32798a4a45cc39d5896552891c352a5de" alt="Nikon Coolpix S3700 front Nikon Coolpix S3700 front"
96 Imaging
45 Features
32 Overall
39
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched April 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.7-6.6) lens
- 118g - 96 x 58 x 20mm
- Launched January 2015
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the S3700 (20MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and S3700 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Fujifilm Z900EXR was revealed 4 years before the S3700 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR matches up versus the S3700 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Nikon Coolpix S3700. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery and Nikon S3700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Nikon S3700
Fujifilm Z900EXR | S3700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon S3700 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
S3700 | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | April 2011 | Newer by 46 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Nikon S3700
Fujifilm Z900EXR | S3700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z900EXR features exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Nikon S3700 has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR compared to the S3700.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f57a/8f57aa977d95fa5ece2e007b2ebbc83ce922ccee" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and S3700 is 95 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e422/9e42216c4683a7055c79e3723d9949143ef01703" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The picture below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and S3700.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Nikon S3700 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm Z900EXR is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee0ab/ee0abf9902536316c27af38d9ef9651189785079" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 sensor size comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad08b/ad08bc945340598b9b2b99e51cc10d234d2fcbbf" alt="Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Nikon S3700 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Nikon Coolpix S3700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Nikon Coolpix S3700 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-04-05 | 2015-01-14 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.7-6.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) | 118 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 240 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $380 | $175 |