Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Announced April 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL10
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung CL5, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and CL5 (1/2.5") possess different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm Z900EXR was brought out 2 years after the CL5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR grades versus the CL5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR & Samsung CL5. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Samsung CL5
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2011 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| CL5 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung CL5
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Fujifilm Z900EXR provides external dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung CL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR against the CL5.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and CL5 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and CL5.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will offer greater detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm Z900EXR provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Samsung CL5 |
| Also called as | - | PL10 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-04-05 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 pounds) | 141g (0.31 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $380 | $391 |