Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched April 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and SL620 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm Z900EXR was introduced 2 years later than the SL620 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR scores vs the SL620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Samsung SL620
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2011 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| SL620 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung SL620
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z900EXR features outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs the SL620.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and SL620 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and SL620.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Z900EXR with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will deliver extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm Z900EXR should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Samsung SL620 |
| Also referred to as | - | PL65 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-04-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $380 | $200 |