Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Launched April 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and ST65 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm Z900EXR was unveiled 3 months after the ST65 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR matches up vs the ST65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Samsung ST65. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Samsung ST65
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| ST65 | Fujifilm Z900EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung ST65
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2011 |  | January 2011 | Same generation |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm Z900EXR offers outer dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs the ST65.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and ST65 is 95 and 99 respectively.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by researching a spec sheet. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and ST65.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will provide you with more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Samsung ST65 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-04-05 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151g (0.33 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $380 | $130 |
