Clicky

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
  • Released April 2011
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Other Name is ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is very well matched but the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and TL240 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The Fujifilm Z900EXR was introduced 16 months later than the TL240 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR scores versus the TL240 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Samsung TL240

 Fujifilm Z900EXR TL240 
LaunchedApril 2011January 2010Fresher by 16 months
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR

 TL240 Fujifilm Z900EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung TL240

 Fujifilm Z900EXR TL240 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3.5"3.5"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and the TL240.

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and TL240.

Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm Z900EXR using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will give you extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm Z900EXR is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Portrait photography factors
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography factors
43
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no RAW format
28
resolution is good (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
Street photography with Samsung TL240
60
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides focus by touch
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no RAW format
heavier than average in class (151 grams)
60
image stabilization (Optical)
includes focus by touch
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Sports photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Sports photography highlights
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no phase detect autofocus
43
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Travel photography highlights
Samsung TL240 Travel photography highlights
65
provides focus by touch
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (151 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
60
includes focus by touch
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
Landscape photography with Samsung TL240
50
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
37
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR as a Vlogging camera
Samsung TL240 as a Vlogging camera
34
decently wide (28mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic port
heavier than average in class (151 grams)
27
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (160 grams)
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung TL240
 Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXRSamsung TL240
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR Samsung TL240
Alternative name - ST5000
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2011-04-05 2010-01-06
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 3200 4800
Maximum boosted ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.5 inch 3.5 inch
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 151 gr (0.33 lbs) 160 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-45A SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $380 $171