Clicky

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR front
 
Samsung TL320 front
Portability
98
Imaging
35
Features
36
Overall
35

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z900EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
  • 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
  • Launched April 2011
Samsung TL320
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Also referred to as WB1000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm Z900EXR versus Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") and TL320 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm Z900EXR was announced 2 years after the TL320 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the Fujifilm Z900EXR scores against the TL320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Samsung TL320

 Fujifilm Z900EXR TL320 
ReleasedApril 2011February 2009More modern by 26 months
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Fujifilm Z900EXR

 TL320 Fujifilm Z900EXR 

Common features in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung TL320

 Fujifilm Z900EXR TL320 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution460k460kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z900EXR comes with outside dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm Z900EXR versus Samsung TL320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm Z900EXR versus the TL320.

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Z900EXR and TL320 is 95 and 98 respectively.

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z900EXR and TL320.

To sum up, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm Z900EXR using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm Z900EXR will give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm Z900EXR is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
Portrait photography with Samsung TL320
43
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2")
lacks RAW support
34
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focus
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Street photography factors
Samsung TL320 Street photography factors
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers touch focus
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competitors (151 grams)
58
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Sports photography details
Samsung TL320 Sports photography details
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2")
lacks phase detect AF
30
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Travel photography advice
Samsung TL320 Travel photography advice
65
offers touch focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (151 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
59
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Landscape photography details
Samsung TL320 Landscape photography details
50
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
sensor is small (1/2")
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
43
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z900EXR Vlogging features
Samsung TL320 Vlogging features
34
fairly wide (28mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (151g)
31
really wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm Z900EXR vs Samsung TL320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z900EXR and Samsung TL320
 Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXRSamsung TL320
General Information
Company FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR Samsung TL320
Otherwise known as - WB1000
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Launched 2011-04-05 2009-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 30.7mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max enhanced ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.9-4.9 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.6 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 151 gr (0.33 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-45A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $380 $380