Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
52 Imaging
93 Features
86 Overall
90
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 102MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm G Mount
- 1320g - 156 x 144 x 75mm
- Announced May 2019
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Fujifilm GFX 100 versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm GFX 100 (102MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (Medium format).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm GFX 100 was unveiled very close to the X1D II 50C and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm GFX 100 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Fujifilm GFX 100 scores vs the X1D II 50C when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm GFX 100 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm GFX 100 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm GFX 100 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm GFX 100 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm GFX 100
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm GFX 100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
Common features in the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm GFX 100 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2019 | June 2019 | Similar generation | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 2360k | 2360k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm GFX 100 offers physical dimensions of 156mm x 144mm x 75mm (6.1" x 5.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 1320 grams (2.91 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm GFX 100 versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm GFX 100 against the X1D II 50C.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm GFX 100 and X1D II 50C is 52 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm GFX 100 and X1D II 50C.
Plainly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Fujifilm GFX 100 to offer extra detail having an extra 51MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm GFX 100 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm GFX 100 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-05-23 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 102MP | 51MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 11648 x 8736 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm G | Hasselblad X |
Amount of lenses | 12 | 13 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inches | 3.60 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 3,690k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 1.09x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/10000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/125s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 2720x1530 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1320 grams (2.91 pounds) | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 144 x 75mm (6.1" x 5.7" x 3.0") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 800 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-T125 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Price at launch | $10,000 | $5,750 |