Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240
52 Imaging
93 Features
86 Overall
90
74 Imaging
69 Features
47 Overall
60
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 102MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm G Mount
- 1320g - 156 x 144 x 75mm
- Announced May 2019
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Leica M Typ 240, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Leica. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm GFX 100 (102MP) and M Typ 240 (24MP) and the Fujifilm GFX 100 (Medium format) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) provide different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm GFX 100 was released 6 years after the M Typ 240 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm GFX 100 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm GFX 100 scores versus the M Typ 240 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm GFX 100 & Leica M Typ 240. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm GFX 100 Gallery & Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm GFX 100 over the Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm GFX 100 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2019 | September 2012 | Newer by 82 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Fujifilm GFX 100
M Typ 240 | Fujifilm GFX 100 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm GFX 100 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm GFX 100 has got external measurements of 156mm x 144mm x 75mm (6.1" x 5.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 1320 grams (2.91 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 240 has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Leica M Typ 240 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm GFX 100 vs the M Typ 240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm GFX 100 and M Typ 240 is 52 and 74 respectively.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The pic here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm GFX 100 and M Typ 240.
Plainly, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm GFX 100 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm GFX 100 will render extra detail as a result of its extra 78 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images way more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm GFX 100 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Fujifilm GFX 100 | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model type | Fujifilm GFX 100 | Leica M Typ 240 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-05-23 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 102MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 11648 x 8736 | 5952 x 3976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm G | Leica M |
Available lenses | 12 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 1% |
Viewfinder magnification | 1.09x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/125 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1320g (2.91 lb) | 680g (1.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 144 x 75mm (6.1" x 5.7" x 3.0") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 800 pictures | 500 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-T125 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Retail cost | $10,000 | $5,479 |