Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
52 Imaging
92 Features
86 Overall
89
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 102MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm G Mount
- 1320g - 156 x 144 x 75mm
- Launched May 2019
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Olympus E-M10 IV, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm GFX 100 (102MP) and E-M10 IV (20MP) and the Fujifilm GFX 100 (Medium format) and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm GFX 100 was manufactured 14 months prior to the E-M10 IV making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm GFX 100 grades against the E-M10 IV in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm GFX 100 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm GFX 100 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm GFX 100 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm GFX 100 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.2" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 2360k |  | 1040k | Crisper display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Fujifilm GFX 100
| E-M10 IV | Fujifilm GFX 100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2020 |  | May 2019 | More recent by 14 months |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Olympus E-M10 IV
| Fujifilm GFX 100 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm GFX 100 has exterior dimensions of 156mm x 144mm x 75mm (6.1" x 5.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 1320 grams (2.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 IV has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm GFX 100 and Olympus E-M10 IV in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm GFX 100 and the E-M10 IV.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm GFX 100 and E-M10 IV is 52 and 81 respectively.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm GFX 100 and E-M10 IV.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm GFX 100 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm GFX 100 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 82MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images more aggressively. The older Fujifilm GFX 100 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm GFX 100 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
| Fujifilm GFX 100 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm GFX 100 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2019-05-23 | 2020-08-04 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | X-Processor 4 | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 102MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 11648 x 8736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 50 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm G | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 12 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 1.09x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 8.7 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/125s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1320 grams (2.91 lb) | 383 grams (0.84 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 156 x 144 x 75mm (6.1" x 5.7" x 3.0") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 800 photographs | 360 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-T125 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Price at launch | $10,000 | $699 |