Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D
55 Imaging
87 Features
82 Overall
85


60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm G Mount
- 900g - 150 x 104 x 87mm
- Introduced September 2021
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Overview
Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm GFX 50S II and Hasselblad X1D, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Hasselblad. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm GFX 50S II (51MP) and the X1D (51MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (Medium format).

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II was announced 5 years later than the X1D and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm GFX 50S II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm GFX 50S II scores against the X1D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm GFX 50S II & Hasselblad X1D. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm GFX 50S II Gallery & Hasselblad X1D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm GFX 50S II over the Hasselblad X1D
Fujifilm GFX 50S II | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2021 | ![]() | June 2016 | More recent by 64 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+1440k dot) |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Fujifilm GFX 50S II
X1D | Fujifilm GFX 50S II |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm GFX 50S II and Hasselblad X1D
Fujifilm GFX 50S II | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm GFX 50S II comes with physical dimensions of 150mm x 104mm x 87mm (5.9" x 4.1" x 3.4") having a weight of 900 grams (1.98 lbs) while the Hasselblad X1D has sizing of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm GFX 50S II and Hasselblad X1D in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm GFX 50S II versus the X1D.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm GFX 50S II and X1D is 55 and 60 respectively.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm GFX 50S II and X1D.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photographs but you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer Fujifilm GFX 50S II should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Hasselblad X1D Specifications
Fujifilm GFX 50S II | Hasselblad X1D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm GFX 50S II | Hasselblad X1D |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2021-09-02 | 2016-06-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 8272 x 6200 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm G | Hasselblad X |
Amount of lenses | 14 | 4 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 3600 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.3 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/125 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 900 grams (1.98 pounds) | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 104 x 87mm (5.9" x 4.1" x 3.4") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 440 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W235 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Launch cost | $3,999 | $6,495 |