Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
59 Imaging
82 Features
77 Overall
80
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 102400)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm G Mount
- 740g - 148 x 94 x 91mm
- Revealed January 2017
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Fujifilm GFX 50S and Hasselblad X1D II 50C, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Hasselblad. The image resolution of the Fujifilm GFX 50S (51MP) and the X1D II 50C (51MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (Medium format).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm GFX 50S was announced 3 years prior to the X1D II 50C which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm GFX 50S being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm GFX 50S scores versus the X1D II 50C with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm GFX 50S & Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm GFX 50S Gallery & Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm GFX 50S over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| Fujifilm GFX 50S | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm GFX 50S
| X1D II 50C | Fujifilm GFX 50S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2019 | January 2017 | Newer by 29 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.60" | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
Common features in the Fujifilm GFX 50S and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| Fujifilm GFX 50S | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 2360k | 2360k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm GFX 50S enjoys physical measurements of 148mm x 94mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 740 grams (1.63 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm GFX 50S and Hasselblad X1D II 50C in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm GFX 50S against the X1D II 50C.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm GFX 50S and X1D II 50C is 59 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The picture here will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm GFX 50S and X1D II 50C.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP and you can expect comparable quality of images but you need to consider the age of the cameras into account. The more aged Fujifilm GFX 50S will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm GFX 50S vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
| Fujifilm GFX 50S | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
| Model | Fujifilm GFX 50S | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2017-01-18 | 2019-06-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | X Processor Pro | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Medium format |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 8272 x 6200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 50 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 117 | 117 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm G | Hasselblad X |
| Total lenses | 12 | 13 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2" | 3.60" |
| Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 3,690 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 1.07x | 0.87x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 360 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/10000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, off | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/125 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 740 grams (1.63 lbs) | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 148 x 94 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-T125 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (dual slots, UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | Dual | Dual |
| Pricing at launch | $5,499 | $5,750 |