Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200
61 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efb63/efb6340c1d8c6a567fbd5c14dc3dcf82f92a2f35" alt="Fujifilm S9800 front Fujifilm S9800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01dd8/01dd8650dec0800f81d1bdb596554d9786c03bab" alt="Nikon Coolpix S8200 front Nikon Coolpix S8200 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Fujifilm S9800 and Nikon S8200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Nikon. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the S8200 (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9800 was introduced 3 years after the S8200 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S8200 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the Fujifilm S9800 matches up vs the S8200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm S9800 and Nikon Coolpix S8200. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9800 Gallery and Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Nikon S8200
Fujifilm S9800 | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 42 months |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Fujifilm S9800
S8200 | Fujifilm S9800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 961k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+501k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Nikon S8200
Fujifilm S9800 | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9800 provides physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon S8200 has measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9800 and Nikon S8200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 vs the S8200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d30f/5d30f2a44225773a0f6f2408939114e1a6ad32b9" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 size comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9800 and S8200 is 61 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ad0f/4ad0fb9a6c610de8c99e110a61ec4c3f5807765a" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The image underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9800 and S8200.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of images but you may want to consider the production date of the cameras into account. The fresher Fujifilm S9800 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aaaa/7aaaaa9f28cddf19e7491b4777d8c71d2c41b1a1" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9dbfe/9dbfeb2e617a2b74dc4b755ffaa2a7f4b1f934d2" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2011-08-24 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 961k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lbs) | 213 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 250 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $299 | $329 |