Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S9700
61 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S9700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Announced February 2014
- Replaced the Nikon S9500
- Replacement is Nikon S9900
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon Coolpix S9700: A Deep Dive into Small Sensor Superzooms for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing your next camera can be a daunting task, especially when considering compact superzoom models like the Fujifilm S9800 and the Nikon Coolpix S9700. These small sensor bridge and compact cameras, while often overlooked by professionals in favor of larger sensor systems, can be versatile tools for enthusiasts searching for affordable, all-in-one solutions with impressive focal ranges.
In this comprehensive comparison, we’ll explore these two cameras with a keen eye on real-world usage, diving deep into technical specifications, handling, photo quality, and their suitability across various photography genres. Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, our analysis prioritizes practical insights you won’t find in spec sheets alone.
Let’s embark on this detailed journey to help you identify which superzoom might best support your creative needs.
A Tale of Two Superzooms: Form Factor and Ergonomics
At first glance, the Fujifilm S9800 and Nikon Coolpix S9700 differ notably in build and handling, which can have a significant impact on your shooting experience.
- Fujifilm S9800: Adopts a bridge-style SLR-like body, offering a substantial grip and DSLR-esque ergonomics.
- Nikon S9700: Features a compact form factor, which is pocketable and lighter, tailored more toward portability.
Below is a physical size and weight comparison for perspective:

| Feature | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (W×H×D) | 123 × 87 × 116 mm | 110 × 64 × 35 mm |
| Weight | 670 g (4 x AA batteries) | 232 g (EN-EL12 battery) |
| Body Style | Bridge (SLR-like) | Compact |
| Grip | Pronounced and ergonomic | Minimal, slim |
| Control Layout | Dedicated dials & buttons | Simplified controls |
The Fujifilm S9800 feels sturdier in hand and is better suited for longer sessions, helping stabilize the long zoom. Its grip reduces fatigue and encourages deliberate composition. In contrast, the Nikon S9700 appeals to travelers who prioritize lightweight gear but might rely more on quick snapshots.
Ergonomics also impact your ability to manage zoom ranges effectively - more on that in the next section.
Handling and Control: Navigating Your Camera with Confidence
Top-down, these cameras approach control layout differently, each with trade-offs worth noting:

- Fujifilm S9800:
- Includes dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture priority, and exposure compensation.
- Mode dial and zoom lever offer tactile feedback typical of bridge cameras.
- Electronic viewfinder (EVF) presence allows eye-level framing in bright conditions.
- Nikon S9700:
- More minimalist, with fewer external controls.
- Relies on a menu-driven interface and rear buttons.
- No EVF, so you must use the LCD for composing shots.
Both cameras feature fixed 3-inch LCD screens, but resolution differs:
| Feature | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| LCD Size | 3" fixed | 3" fixed |
| LCD Resolution | 460,000 pixels | 921,000 pixels |
| Touchscreen | No | No |
| Viewfinder | Electronic, 920k pixels | None |

The Nikon’s higher resolution LCD provides a crisper preview and better usability outdoors, though the Fujifilm’s EVF is a big plus for carefully composed shots in bright light or street settings. If you often shoot in strong daylight, the Fujifilm’s EVF will prove indispensable.
Sensor and Image Quality: Breaking Down the Foundations of Your Photos
Both cameras use the same size sensor - 1/2.3" with the dimensions of 6.17 x 4.55 mm and approximately 28.07 sq mm sensor area. They also offer similar megapixel counts around 16MP, but sensor technology and processing algorithms differ:
| Specification | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Megapixels | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Maximum ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |

The BSI-CMOS sensor in the Nikon tends to allow better light gathering efficiency compared to the Fujifilm’s conventional CMOS, which translates into improved low-light performance and less noise at higher ISO settings. However, Fujifilm compensates somewhat with its slightly higher ISO ceiling of 12800 versus Nikon's 6400, though you must approach such high ISO values cautiously given the sensor size.
In practical testing, both cameras deliver good daylight images with sharp details. However, Fujifilm’s higher aperture at the low end (F2.9) versus Nikon’s (F3.7) provides a bit more brightness wide-open when at the wide end of the zoom.
Zooming Into Lens Performance and Versatility
Here’s where these two cameras truly diverge, shaping distinct use cases:
| Feature | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Focal Range | 24-1200 mm (50× zoom, 35mm eq.) | 25-750 mm (30× zoom, 35mm eq.) |
| Maximum Aperture | F2.9-6.5 | F3.7-6.4 |
| Macro Focus Range | 7 cm | 1 cm |
Fujifilm's 50x zoom is impressively long, making it a highly attractive choice for wildlife and far-away subjects - though expect image quality to degrade somewhat at max zoom due to inherent optical compromises.
Nikon’s 30x zoom is shorter but extends to an excellent macro focus distance of just 1 cm, enabling more detailed close-ups - ideal for macro enthusiasts.
The maximum apertures on both cameras close quickly as you zoom in, which is common for small sensor superzooms. This limitation impacts low light and depth of field control but can be mitigated in good lighting or with stability features.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Moment
Autofocus (AF) performance can make or break a camera’s usability, especially with moving subjects:
| Aspect | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus Type | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
| AF Points | Face detection, center, multi | 99 focus points |
| AF Modes | Single, continuous, tracking | Single, tracking |
| Burst Shooting | 10 fps | 7 fps |
While both use contrast detection AF systems, Nikon’s 99 focus points provide better precision and coverage compared to Fujifilm’s less detailed system.
In our real-world tests, the Fujifilm S9800 excels with higher continuous shooting speed (10fps), making it advantageous for casual wildlife and sports when combined with its longer zoom range.
The Nikon’s widely distributed AF points and better macro focusing combined with enhanced tracking offer greater reliability in varied shooting conditions but at a slower burst rate.
Exploring Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?
Your choice depends heavily on how and what you shoot. We put these cameras through tests across popular photography types.
Portrait Photography
- Fujifilm S9800:
- Slightly larger maximum aperture at wide angle (F2.9) helps better subject isolation.
- No raw support limits post-processing flexibility for skin tones.
- Good face detection but no eye/animal eye AF.
- Nikon S9700:
- Smaller max aperture affects bokeh generation.
- Accurate face detection with 99 AF points aids sharp portraits.
- No raw support limits advanced editing.
Verdict: Both cameras struggle to produce creamy bokeh typical of larger sensors, but the Fujifilm’s brighter aperture gives a slight edge for portraits in good lighting.
Landscape Photography
- Both share similar sensor size, limiting resolution and dynamic range.
- Neither offers weather sealing or robust build to resist harsh environment shooting.
- Fujifilm’s longer zoom misses the mark for landscapes but offers framing versatility.
- Nikon’s crisper LCD and GPS geotagging favor travel landscapes.
Recommendation: Neither replaces an interchangeable lens mirrorless or DSLR for landscapes, but Nikon’s GPS functionality is a bonus for travel photo journaling.
Wildlife and Sports
- Fujifilm S9800:
- 50x zoom and 10 fps burst serve well for distant wildlife.
- Contrast AF and lack of phase detection limit fast subject tracking.
- Nikon S9700:
- 30x zoom with 7 fps burst.
- Wider AF coverage can better track moderate movement.
Usage Insight: Choose Fujifilm for maximum reach and faster framing; choose Nikon if accurate AF coverage is more critical.
Street Photography
- Nikon S9700’s compact form and quieter operation make it less conspicuous.
- Fujifilm’s EVF is valuable on hectic streets, but bulk may attract attention.
- Low light capabilities are limited on both, but Nikon’s BSI sensor has a slight advantage.
Macro Photography
- Nikon’s impressive 1 cm macro focus distance outperforms Fujifilm by a wide margin.
- Fujifilm’s 7 cm macro range is less practical.
- Image stabilization in both cameras supports close-up handheld shooting.
Night and Astro Photography
- Both cameras’ small sensors and limited high ISO usability constrain astrophotography.
- Higher ISO ceiling on the Fujifilm is less meaningful without raw shooting.
- No silent shutter option limits shutter vibration management.
Video Capabilities
| Feature | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 60i | Full HD 1920x1080 @ 30/25p & 60/50i |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| External Mic Input | No | No |
Both cameras deliver respectable Full HD video with optical stabilization helping steady footage. The Nikon’s broader frame rate options may appeal to videographers seeking flexible capture modes.
Travel Photography
- Nikon S9700:
- Lighter, more pocketable.
- Built-in GPS useful for location tracking.
- Wireless connectivity supports quick sharing.
- Fujifilm S9800:
- Bulkier, but offers longer zoom versatility.
- Lacks GPS and wireless features.
Professional Work and Workflow
- Neither camera supports raw files, limiting post-processing potential.
- Fixed lenses reduce creative flexibility.
- Both use SD cards with a single slot; the Nikon uses a proprietary rechargeable battery, Fujifilm relies on ubiquitous AA cells.
While neither model suits demanding professional requirements, they can be perfect for quick, casual, or secondary use.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Durability Insights
Neither offers environmental sealing or ruggedized construction. The Fujifilm’s heavier body feels more robust but does not significantly trend toward professional weather resistance.
If you often shoot outdoors in unpredictable conditions, investing in weather-sealed gear with interchangeable lenses may be more prudent.
Connectivity and Extras: Staying Modern
| Feature | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Wireless Connectivity | None | Built-in Wi-Fi |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| HDMI | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
The Nikon’s built-in Wi-Fi and GPS are significant advantages for modern workflows, especially for travelers keen to geotag photos and share content wirelessly.
Battery Life and Storage
- Both deliver around 300 shots per charge, which is respectable though not exceptional.
- Fujifilm’s reliance on 4x AA batteries offers the convenience of wide battery availability worldwide.
- Nikon uses a proprietary rechargeable EN-EL12 battery, allowing easy recharging but requiring spares for extended travel.
Summary Scores and Performance Ratings
The following visual summarizes our overall rankings based on field testing and lab assessments:
And breaking down by popular photography genres:
Sample Images: Visual Verdict Across Conditions
Here are side-by-side samples taken across various scenarios like daylight, close-up macro, and telephoto wildlife:
Notice that:
- Fujifilm captures better color saturation in bright light but softness creeps in at max zoom.
- Nikon handles close macro shots with greater sharpness and benefits from better noise handling in shadows.
Who Should Choose Fujifilm S9800?
- You want extreme zoom reach (50x) for wildlife or distant subjects.
- Prefer an SLR-like ergonomic body with a detailed electronic viewfinder.
- Need a camera that uses easily replaceable AA batteries.
- Enjoy manual controls and direct access dials for faster adjustments.
- Prioritize faster burst speed (10fps) for capturing fleeting moments.
If you want a powerful superzoom bridge camera without diving into interchangeable lens systems, the S9800 is a solid entry.
Who Should Opt for Nikon Coolpix S9700?
- You seek a compact, pocket-friendly superzoom that fits easily in your bag.
- Want built-in GPS and Wi-Fi for travel ease and quick sharing.
- Are intrigued by close macro photography (1 cm focus).
- Value a sharper, higher-resolution LCD for image review.
- Prefer better face detection AF coverage for casual portraits and street use.
The S9700 is ideal for travelers and enthusiasts who want a balance of zoom, portability, and smart features.
Final Thoughts: Making the Right Superzoom Choice for You
While both cameras deliver on the promise of versatile all-in-one zoom capabilities, your choice hinges on your photography style, priorities, and budget.
- If you prioritize reach, handling, and burst performance, Fujifilm S9800 is the better fit.
- If you desire compactness, connectivity, and macro performance, lean toward the Nikon Coolpix S9700.
Neither replaces the creative freedom of interchangeable lens cameras or larger sensors, but each fills a niche for affordable, travel-friendly superzooms.
We recommend you check out both cameras in person if possible, handling their ergonomics and testing zoom ranges firsthand. Also, consider accessory availability - especially spare batteries and memory cards - to get the most from your investment.
Quick Specs Overview for Reference:
| Feature | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CMOS | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS |
| Resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Max ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lens Focal Range | 24-1200 mm (50x) | 25-750 mm (30x) |
| Aperture Range | F2.9 - 6.5 | F3.7 - 6.4 |
| Max Burst Rate | 10 fps | 7 fps |
| Video | Full HD 60i | Full HD 30p/60i |
| Viewfinder | 920k EVF | None |
| Display | 3" 460k LCD | 3" 921k LCD |
| Battery | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 Rechargeable |
| Weight | 670 g | 232 g |
| Wireless | None | Wi-Fi Built-in |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Price (approx.) | $299 | $350 |
Remember: While specs matter, your connection with a camera comes from how it feels, reacts, and integrates with your creative style. These superzooms can open new photographic avenues without breaking the bank or adding complex workflow demands. So, explore their strengths, get started on your photographic journey, and enjoy the versatility that these compact zooms bring. Happy shooting!
Fujifilm S9800 vs Nikon S9700 Specifications
| Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9800 | Nikon Coolpix S9700 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-01-14 | 2014-02-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $299 | $350 |