Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000
88 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Alternative Name is mju 9000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-50 was revealed 3 years later than the 9000 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the SH-50 grades against the 9000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SH-50 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus 9000
| SH-50 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 45 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SH-50
| 9000 | SH-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus 9000
| SH-50 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-50 offers outer dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the SH-50 versus the 9000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SH-50 and 9000 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements only by reading specifications. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-50 and 9000.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus SH-50 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer SH-50 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Alternate name | - | mju 9000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 50 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $300 |