Clicky

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
61
Imaging
41
Features
46
Overall
43
Fujifilm S9800 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2015
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm S9800 was manufactured 3 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the Fujifilm S9800 matches up against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S9800 VR-320 
IntroducedJanuary 2015July 2011More modern by 43 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S9800

 VR-320 Fujifilm S9800 

Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus VR-320

 Fujifilm S9800 VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9800 has physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 versus the VR-320.

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9800 and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The pic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9800 and VR-320.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm S9800 to render more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S9800 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
37
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Street photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Street photography factors
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than average (670g)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Sports photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography highlights
53
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-320 Travel photography info
57
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than average (670 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
70
lighter than average (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9800
Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
42
rather wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm S9800 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
57
rather wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than average (670g)
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than average (158g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm S9800 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9800 and Olympus VR-320
 Fujifilm S9800Olympus VR-320
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm S9800 Olympus VR-320
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2015-01-14 2011-07-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 12800 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance 7cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 920 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1700 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 670g (1.48 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID 4 x AA LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $299 $179