Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W
61 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Also referred to as WB5500
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm S9800 versus Samsung HZ50W, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9800 was introduced 4 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm S9800 grades vs the HZ50W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm S9800 & Samsung HZ50W. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9800 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Samsung HZ50W
| Fujifilm S9800 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | May 2010 | Newer by 58 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Fujifilm S9800
| HZ50W | Fujifilm S9800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Samsung HZ50W
| Fujifilm S9800 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9800 has physical dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9800 versus Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 vs the HZ50W.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9800 and HZ50W is 61 and 70 respectively.
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9800 and HZ50W.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm S9800 to produce greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9800 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Fujifilm S9800 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9800 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also Known as | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-01-14 | 2010-05-03 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $299 | $250 |