Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F
61 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efb63/efb6340c1d8c6a567fbd5c14dc3dcf82f92a2f35" alt="Fujifilm S9800 front Fujifilm S9800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba44a/ba44a222150612400a1bd4c12a80aaa4b3435771" alt="Samsung WB2200F front Samsung WB2200F front"
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Introduced January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Fujifilm S9800 versus Samsung WB2200F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the WB2200F (16MP) is fairly close and both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9800 was released 13 months after the WB2200F making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9800 matches up against the WB2200F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm S9800 and Samsung WB2200F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S9800 Gallery and Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Samsung WB2200F
Fujifilm S9800 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 13 months |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Fujifilm S9800
WB2200F | Fujifilm S9800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Samsung WB2200F
Fujifilm S9800 | WB2200F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9800 enjoys exterior measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB2200F has sizing of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S9800 versus Samsung WB2200F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 versus the WB2200F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92109/92109afb5ed3538e69a0767101fc409d46f21d78" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9800 and WB2200F is 61 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6867e/6867e5d5352caf6d86f0559ba1738d9511558d86" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9800 and WB2200F.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution so you should expect comparable quality of photos though you may want to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher Fujifilm S9800 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f49d3/f49d3011b0a12d1e2bad51500fbc7bb6a4cfe6be" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad9d5/ad9d54342c46c9d7f53cc057f940fb70db151d48" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
Fujifilm S9800 | Samsung WB2200F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm S9800 | Samsung WB2200F |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-01-14 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | 200k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 1/8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 708 gr (1.56 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | BP-1410 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $299 | $599 |