Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F
61 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efb63/efb6340c1d8c6a567fbd5c14dc3dcf82f92a2f35" alt="Fujifilm S9800 front Fujifilm S9800 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Fujifilm S9800 versus Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly similar and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9800 was announced 13 months after the WB350F making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm S9800 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm S9800 grades vs the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm S9800 and Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9800 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Samsung WB350F
Fujifilm S9800 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | More modern by 13 months |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm S9800
WB350F | Fujifilm S9800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Samsung WB350F
Fujifilm S9800 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9800 features outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has sizing of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9800 versus Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 vs the WB350F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43fe1/43fe1a240c226b1123d8e0b297d9eeb41ba1b7dc" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9800 and WB350F is 61 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4efe3/4efe35258e27b9e0ae9fb4bc7eb782f644c515b0" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading technical specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9800 and WB350F.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs but you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The fresher Fujifilm S9800 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48871/488715a46520da07cc0fa4fca38725d9e820abe5" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b623/7b623e0ee81cdb08dd8316cc9030a9928bce3319" alt="Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S9800 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Fujifilm S9800 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm S9800 | Samsung WB350F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-01-14 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670g (1.48 lbs) | 276g (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $299 | $260 |