Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400
61 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2015
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm S9800 versus Sony H400, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9800 (16MP) and the H400 (20MP) is pretty comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S9800 was released 12 months after the H400 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the Fujifilm S9800 scores versus the H400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm S9800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm S9800 Gallery and Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9800 over the Sony H400
| Fujifilm S9800 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2015 | February 2014 | More modern by 12 months | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Fujifilm S9800
| H400 | Fujifilm S9800 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9800 and Sony H400
| Fujifilm S9800 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm S9800 provides outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9800 versus Sony H400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm S9800 against the H400.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9800 and H400 is 61 and 62 respectively.
Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The pic here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9800 and H400.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Sony H400 to provide more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9800 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm S9800 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Fujifilm S9800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-01-14 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dot | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 8.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 lbs) | 628 gr (1.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $299 | $268 |