Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as EasyShare Max
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Fujifilm S9900w versus Kodak Z990, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and Z990 (12MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Fujifilm S9900w was revealed 4 years later than the Z990 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S9900w grades against the Z990 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm S9900w & Kodak EasyShare Z990. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Kodak Z990 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Kodak Z990
| Fujifilm S9900w | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 | January 2011 | Fresher by 50 months | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Fujifilm S9900w
| Z990 | Fujifilm S9900w |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Kodak Z990
| Fujifilm S9900w | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9900w features outer dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Kodak Z990 has measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") and a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm S9900w versus Kodak Z990 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w compared to the Z990.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and Z990 is 61 and 68 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading through technical specs. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm S9900w and Z990.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Fujifilm S9900w to give you greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm S9900w provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm S9900w vs Kodak Z990 Specifications
| Fujifilm S9900w | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Kodak EasyShare Z990 |
| Otherwise known as | - | EasyShare Max |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 8.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 445 grams (0.98 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $719 | $299 |